查看完整版本: 女人不愿亲热的五种情况

女人不愿亲热的五种情况

在与你见面不到五分钟，他便要求与你来一场，甚至立即动手帮你宽衣……性爱本是一件十分美妙的事，但一些糟透的男人总是往往令人失望，做出各样破坏美好性事的事情，先和大家说说在亲热之前的讨厌事。

[b]    1、处处是战场[/b]

    女人最渴望便是每一次性交都是完美的。但那些讨厌的男人就永远不会这样想，他们要的只是要发泄，不会想在哪做会是舒适的地方。所以每当他们一有冲动的时候便会不顾一切的去和你做，不理自己身处的环境适合与否，都想大干一餐。所以他会叫你到时钟酒店去，在酒吧的厕所掀起你的裙子，甚至在狭窄的车子前座也会乱搞。遇见这样的男人，绝对是女人的一大难题。

[b]    2、欲火即焚身[/b]

    不知道是自己真的那么惹火，还是他真的是性地饥民，在与你见面不到五分钟，他便要求与你来一场，甚至立即动手帮你宽衣。这种急色鬼毫无情趣可言，他们不会明白女人是要时间来酝酿情感的，他们这样的反应只会给人一种按钟、开门、除衫、做爱的一楼一凤感觉，多么的可悲。

[b]    3、不理你死活[/b]

    每个人都有情绪的，但那些讨厌的男人是不会理会你的感情。可能你的好朋友刚刚去世，有情有义的人伤心欲绝，但他却不曾理会你的心情，仍是不断的向你需索，当你是一部毫无感情的性机器。不理别人感受的男人实在讨厌。

    [b]4、污糟乞人憎[/b]

    女人在性爱之前总爱把自己打扮得靓靓，好让男人有良好的视觉感受，所以事前清洁当然不少得，否则传来阵阵异味便大杀风景。但那些男人却刚刚相反，他不会为你设想，他们总是不干不净的抱你，完全不顾你的感受，立即使你的兴致跌到最低点。

[b]    5、乱开空头支票[/b]

    男人在和你上床前必定说出各式各样的动听说话，而你千万不要当是真，否则你便要做一做IQ Test了。但他们为甚么要说出这些不会实现的空话呢？大家都知道是虚假的，但仍义不容辞的说出来，实在令人反感。

:victory: :lol

Bush misused Iraq intelligence - Senate report

Updated: 2008-06-06 07:16
Bush misused Iraq intelligence - Senate report

WASHINGTON -- President George W. Bush and his top policymakers misstated Saddam Hussein's links to terrorism and ignored doubts among intelligence agencies about Iraq's arms programs as they made a case for war, the Senate intelligence committee reported on Thursday.
[URL=http://www.fcsgame.com/]world of warcraft gold[/URL]
The report shows an administration that "led the nation to war on false premises," said the committee's Democratic Chairman, Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia. Several Republicans on the committee protested its findings as a "partisan exercise."

The committee studied major speeches by Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other officials in advance of the US-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, and compared key assertions with intelligence available at the time.
Statements that Iraq had a partnership with al Qaeda were wrong and unsupported by intelligence, the report said.

It said that Bush's and Cheney's assertions that Saddam was prepared to arm terrorist groups with weapons of mass destruction for attacks on the United States contradicted available intelligence.

Such assertions had a strong resonance with a US public, still reeling after al Qaeda's September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Polls showed that many Americans believed Iraq played a role in the attacks, even long after Bush acknowledged in September 2003 that there was no evidence Saddam was involved.

The report also said administration prewar statements on Iraq's weapons programs were backed up in most cases by available US intelligence, but officials failed to reflect internal debate over those findings, which proved wrong.

PUBLIC CAMPAIGN

The long-delayed Senate study supported previous reports and findings that the administration's main cases for war -- that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was spreading them to terrorists -- were inaccurate and deeply flawed.

"The president and his advisors undertook a relentless public campaign in the aftermath of the (September 11) attacks to use the war against al Qaeda as a justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein," Rockefeller said in written commentary on the report.
[URL=http://www.just4gold.com/age-of-conan-gold.html]Age of Conan Gold[/URL]
"Representing to the American people that the two had an operational partnership and posed a single, indistinguishable threat was fundamentally misleading and led the nation to war on false premises."

A statement to Congress by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that the Iraqi government hid weapons of mass destruction in facilities underground was not backed up by intelligence information, the report said. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said Rumsfeld's comments should be investigated further, but he stopped short of urging a criminal probe.
[URL=http://www.just4gold.com/age-of-conan-gold.html]AOC gold[/URL]
The committee voted 10-5 to approve the report, with two Republican lawmakers supporting it. Sen. Christopher Bond of Missouri and three other Republican panel members denounced the study in an attached dissent.

"The committee finds itself once again consumed with political gamesmanship," the Republicans said. The effort to produce the report "has indeed resulted in a partisan exercise." They said, however, that the report demonstrated that Bush administration statements were backed by intelligence and "it was the intelligence that was faulty."

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said: "We had the intelligence that we had, fully vetted, but it was wrong. We certainly regret that and we've taken measures to fix it."
[URL=http://www.fast-wowgold.com]FFXI Gil[/URL]
[URL=http://www.fast-wowgold.com]Final fantasy xi gil[/URL]
PUBLIC SUPPORT

US public opinion on the war, supportive at first, has soured, contributing to a dive in Bush's popularity.

The conflict is likely to be a key issue in the November presidential election between Republican John McCain, who supports the war, and Democrat Barack Obama, who opposed the war from the start and says he would aim to pull US troops out within 16 months of taking office in January 2009.

Rockefeller has announced his support for Obama.

The administration's record in making its case for Iraq has also been cited by critics of Bush's get-tough policy on Iran. They accuse Bush of overstating the potential threat of Iran's nuclear program in order to justify the possible use of force.

A second report by the committee faulted the administration's handling of December 2001 Rome meetings between defense officials and Iranian informants, which dealt with the Iran issue. It said department officials failed to share intelligence from the meeting, which Rockefeller said demonstrated a "fundamental disdain" for other intelligence agencies.